From 2d962d0ca362f375f13b52ed638a2b183b4cb062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam James Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 10:39:22 +0000 Subject: 15.0.0: add 73_all_PR117646-match-Fix-the-max-a-b-0-pattern-for-pointers.patch Signed-off-by: Sam James --- ...ch-Fix-the-max-a-b-0-pattern-for-pointers.patch | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 15.0.0/gentoo/README.history | 4 ++ 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 15.0.0/gentoo/73_all_PR117646-match-Fix-the-max-a-b-0-pattern-for-pointers.patch diff --git a/15.0.0/gentoo/73_all_PR117646-match-Fix-the-max-a-b-0-pattern-for-pointers.patch b/15.0.0/gentoo/73_all_PR117646-match-Fix-the-max-a-b-0-pattern-for-pointers.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c0ab935 --- /dev/null +++ b/15.0.0/gentoo/73_all_PR117646-match-Fix-the-max-a-b-0-pattern-for-pointers.patch @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +From 45a3277149d95a51cf9109cab87ee39a7dce73e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +Message-ID: <45a3277149d95a51cf9109cab87ee39a7dce73e2.1731926298.git.sam@gentoo.org> +From: Andrew Pinski +Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:21:58 -0800 +Subject: [PATCH] match: Fix the `max==0` pattern for pointers [PR117646] + +For pointers I forgot that BIT_IOR_EXPR is not valid so when +I added the pattern to convert `max != 0` (r15-5356), GCC +would start to ICEing saying pointer types were not valid for +BIT_IOR_EXPR. +This fixes the problem by casting to the unsigned type of the +inner type. There was another way of fixing this to handling it +as `a == 0 & b == 0` but both match and reassoication (for pointers) +will then convert it back into the form I am creating here so +let's just use that form instead. + +Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. + + PR tree-optimization/117646 + +gcc/ChangeLog: + + * match.pd (`max==0`): Add casts to `unsigned type`. + +gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: + + * gcc.dg/torture/minmaxneeqptr-1.c: New test. + +Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski +--- + gcc/match.pd | 6 ++++-- + .../gcc.dg/torture/minmaxneeqptr-1.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++ + 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/minmaxneeqptr-1.c + +diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd +index 4bec24a21b29..f5181325f3b9 100644 +--- a/gcc/match.pd ++++ b/gcc/match.pd +@@ -4799,9 +4799,11 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT) + MAX (A, B) != 0 -> (A|B) != 0 iff unsigned. */ + (for cmp (eq ne) + (simplify +- (cmp (max @0 @1) integer_zerop@2) ++ (cmp (max @0 @1) integer_zerop) + (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0))) +- (cmp (bit_ior @0 @1) @2)))) ++ (with { tree utype = unsigned_type_for (TREE_TYPE (@0)); } ++ (cmp (bit_ior (convert:utype @0) (convert:utype @1)) ++ { build_zero_cst (utype); } ))))) + + /* Undo fancy ways of writing max/min or other ?: expressions, like + a - ((a - b) & -(a < b)) and a - (a - b) * (a < b) into (a < b) ? b : a. +diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/minmaxneeqptr-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/minmaxneeqptr-1.c +new file mode 100644 +index 000000000000..aa45722330f4 +--- /dev/null ++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/minmaxneeqptr-1.c +@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ ++/* { dg-do compile } */ ++ ++/* PR tree-optimization/117646 */ ++ ++int maxeq(char *a, char *b) { ++ char *p = a < b ? b : a; ++ return p == (void*)0; ++} ++int maxne(char *a, char *b) { ++ char *p = a < b ? b : a; ++ return p == (void*)0; ++} ++ ++int mineq(char *a, char *b) { ++ char *p = a > b ? b : a; ++ return p == (void*)0; ++} ++int minne(char *a, char *b) { ++ char *p = a > b ? b : a; ++ return p == (void*)0; ++} +-- +2.47.0 + diff --git a/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history b/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history index af598af..df484a6 100644 --- a/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history +++ b/15.0.0/gentoo/README.history @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +26 18 November 2024 + + + 73_all_PR117646-match-Fix-the-max-a-b-0-pattern-for-pointers.patch + 25 18 November 2024 + 72_all_PR117628-libgcc-c23.patch -- cgit v1.2.3-65-gdbad